What CNBC Wouldn’t Tell Its U.S. Viewers

  • The Rickards tweet that foreshadowed the demise of “Mooch”
  • The real reason Scaramucci was sent packing
  • Opening shot fired in U.S.-China trade war
  • Sanctions pose “existential threat” to Russia: How will it respond?
  • Inflation slowdown pauses, while incomes stall
  • Missing: One gold replica of the Apollo 11 lunar module
  • The wisdom of Apple’s cash hoard

We don’t want to say our Jim Rickards knew something was going down, but… note the time and date on this tweet yesterday morning:

Jim Rickards tweet

Less than eight hours later, Anthony Scaramucci’s brief tenure as White House communications director was over. By at least one account, he was escorted from White House grounds. (No word whether he was seen carrying a cardboard box.)

The mainstream says “Mooch” was done in by his foul-mouthed rant against other top White House aides, and/or a desire by the new White House chief of staff, retired Gen. John Kelly, to have a “clean slate.”

But Jim believes another factor proved decisive — Scaramucci selling his hedge fund to a Chinese conglomerate.

The sale is pending approval by an obscure but important federal body called the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. CFIUS’ main function is to evaluate foreign purchases of U.S. companies for national security risks. Jim has previously worked with intelligence officials who are part of CFIUS.

“My recommendation would have been for CFIUS to turn the deal down… we had always warned ‘don’t let our adversaries such as China or Russia get plugged into the U.S. financial system’… When I was involved, this deal would have not gone through,” Jim told CNBC yesterday.

“In some ways, the White House is probably relieved to get rid of Scaramucci because now, no matter what happens to that deal, that burden won’t be with the White House. Using the [New Yorker] interview was great cover to get rid of Scaramucci before the hedge fund deal and national security review blew up in his face.”

Curiously, Jim was interviewed by CNBC’s Asian channel. Evidently the network judged this story too subtle and nuanced for dumb American audiences. But we think much better of our readership here at The 5.

Anyway, Mooch is now history. With Jim’s help, we’ll turn our attention to the future today.

Hint: It’s grim…

As long as we have China on the brain… “The long-expected trade war with China has begun at last,” says Jim.

It turns out CFIUS has already objected to at least nine foreign acquisitions of U.S. companies this year, according to an analysis by Reuters. The newswire calls it “a historically high number that bodes poorly for China’s overseas buying spree.”

As you might recall, Jim says Donald Trump put his campaign promises of a trade war with China on hold last spring, in hopes Beijing would somehow lean on North Korea to curb its nuclear weapons and missile programs. A 100-day clock started during Trump’s meeting at Mar-a-Lago with Chinese president Xi Jinping last April.

The clock ran out on July 15. North Korea continues to conduct missile tests, although the much-hyped test of a missile hypothetically capable of hitting the U.S. mainland last week appears to be another bust; the missile broke up on re-entry.

Over the weekend Trump tweeted about how “China could easily solve this problem!” In response, China’s ambassador to the United Nations says, “They [the United States and North Korea] hold the primary responsibility to keep things moving, to start moving in the right direction, not China.”

The denied deals by CFIUS are only the start of this new trade war, says Jim. “Soon Trump will announce steel and aluminum tariffs. After that, more action will be taken to punish Chinese banks that help North Korea finance its weapons programs.

“By November, the U.S. will label China a currency manipulator, which will start another review process, leading to still further sanctions. China will not take any of this lying down but will retaliate with its own sanctions, tariffs and bans on U.S. investment in China.

“This trade and currency war will shake markets and be a major head wind for world growth.”

To say nothing of a prelude to a U.S. attack on North Korea. Jim still believes that’s in the cards for early next year.

But the grim future doesn’t end there…

“These new sanctions pose an existential threat to Russia,” says Jim of legislation Congress passed last week that the president is set to sign.

A veto is pointless because an override is certain: The sanctions bill passed with only two dissenting votes in the Senate and three in the House. The narrative about Russia “hacking the election” has overwhelming bipartisan appeal, the lack of evidence notwithstanding.

Absent from much of the mainstream coverage is exactly what these sanctions entail. It’s worth exploring.

“This new law,” Jim explains, “provides that U.S. companies may not participate in Russian efforts to explore for oil and gas in the Arctic. Even foreign companies that do business with Russia in Arctic exploration will be banned from U.S. markets and U.S. contracts.”

Uhh — this is a problem. “Russia depends heavily on oil and gas revenue to propel its economy,” says Jim. “Russia tries to control new discoveries in order to maintain its quasi-monopoly position as the premier energy provider to Europe. Russia needs Western technology to meet the challenges of Arctic exploration. In effect, this law handicaps Russia’s efforts financially and technologically and weakens its grip on global energy markets.”

Hold that thought…

For bonus points, the bill could also touch off a trade war between America and Europe.

The sanctions crack down hard on companies involved in financing Nord Stream 2 — an offshore natural gas pipeline pumping Russian gas to Germany.

Germany needs gas to stay warm in the winter — and to wean its power grid off the nuclear plants it plans to shut down by 2022.

If gas won’t come from Russia, it would have to come in the form of liquefied natural gas shipped on tankers (at great cost) from the United States. Sucks for the Germans, but great for American LNG providers like Cheniere Energy (LNG) — which spent nearly $4 million on lobbying last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

European leaders are calling BS: “America First cannot mean that Europe’s interests come last,” says European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker.

“We consider this as being against international law, plain and simple,” adds Germany’s economy minister Brigitte Zypries. “Of course we don’t want a trade war. But it is important the European Commission now looks into countermeasures.”

But for our purposes today, it’s the Russian countermeasures that are most worrisome.

The Russian business daily Kommersant reports that Moscow intends to ban all American tech companies and all American farm products from the Russian market. Oh, and no more exports of Russian titanium for Boeing; by some estimates up to 30% of the titanium Boeing needs for its airplanes comes from Russia.

But what if it doesn’t end there? “Russian retaliation will not consist of reciprocal sanctions on the U.S.,” says Jim Rickards. “Russia has said it will strike ‘asymmetrically.’

“This means Russia will use the means it is best at, including cyberattacks. If you wake up one day soon and the power grid is down and banks and stock exchanges are closed, you can thank President Putin and the U.S. Congress for starting a financial and cyberwar that neither side could control.”

[Ed. note: Nor is it only geopolitical events that could rock the markets in the weeks and months ahead. Jim believes the Trump Justice Department is about to unload a bombshell on one of Wall Street’s most-beloved stocks… and the blast zone will extend far beyond just one company.]

But in the meantime, the stock market parties on. As we write the Dow industrials are only 22 points away from 22,000.

The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq are in the green as well… but the small-cap Russell 2000 is down a bit.

The dollar index is inching below the support line of 93 that’s held since early 2015. Too soon to call it a decisive break, but we’re watching closely. Gold has added a few bucks, the bid now $1,273.

The slowdown in the inflation rate appears to be over, at least for the moment.

The Commerce Department is out this morning with “core PCE” — the Federal Reserve’s favorite measure of inflation. When the Fed talks about its 2% inflation target, this is the number it has in mind.

The number began what the Fed would consider an alarming slide in March. Finally after three months, that slide’s been arrested at 1.5%.

Core personal consumption expenditures, year-over-year percentage change

None of this likely changes the Fed’s plans: It will probably start trimming its balance sheet next month, but any further increases in the fed funds rate are on hold till December at the earliest.

Meanwhile, the Commerce Department’s “income and spend” numbers are nothing to write home about. Personal incomes were ruler-flat in June — way out of line with an “expert consensus” expecting a 0.4% jump. Consumer spending, meanwhile, bumped up 0.1%.

So Americans were spending out of an empty pocket — which is reflected in a falling savings rate, now 3.8%.

“These results do not point to much consumer momentum going into the third quarter,” is the drily understated conclusion from Econoday.

On the heels of the recent theft of a giant gold coin in Berlin, we now have a purloined solid-gold replica of the Apollo 11 lunar module.

It was made by the French jeweler Cartier shortly after the first moon landing, in 1969. Until its disappearance last Friday night, the 5-inch replica resided at the Armstrong Air and Space Museum in Wapakoneta, Ohio — Neil Armstrong’s boyhood home.

Apollo 11 Lunar Space Module

If found, please call the FBI or the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation [Armstrong Air and Space Museum photo via Wapakoneta Police]

The thieves left behind a moon rock — a fact that leads retired NASA agent Joseph Gutheinz Jr. to believe the thieves were in for the replica’s melt value and not its collector value. (And no one seems to know just how much gold the replica contains.)

“Either they didn’t have easy access to the moon rock, or they weren’t into collectibles,” Gutheinz tells The Associated Press. “They were into turning a quick buck.”

Gutheinz knows a thing or two about such capers; he ran a sting operation in 1998 that recovered a stolen moon rock from Apollo 17. But if the Apollo 11 replica is indeed melted down, he says it’ll be mighty hard to track down the perps.

“What Apple’s doing is smart as far as I’m concerned,” writes a reader about Apple’s giant cash hoard.

“What they have undoubtedly figured out is that the stock market is going to take a major hit here sometime in the next few months and they are waiting on the sidelines with tons of cash in hand to pick up good producing companies at bargain-basement prices. They deserve praise, not condemnation.”

The 5: That might well be the case. Alternatively, they’re waiting for corporate income tax reform, or some sort of tax “forgiveness” plan encouraging big companies to bring their overseas cash home.

Given events in Washington right now, we’d place a far higher probability on the market taking a hit…

Best regards,

Dave Gonigam
The 5 Min. Forecast

P.S. “So Far, So AMAZING!” writes a happy reader of our newest service, Alan Knuckman’s Weekly Wealth Alert.

“First trade with Alan’s WPI system and I scored an impressive 50% gain. I was thrilled…

I’m looking forward to a long and profitable relationship.”

With access to a unique patent-pending tool, Alan serves up weekly opportunities to double your money or better in the space of only a few days.

Curious how it works? Here’s Alan’s introduction.

Dave Gonigam

Dave Gonigam

Dave Gonigam has been managing editor of The 5 Min. Forecast since September 2010. Before joining the research and writing team at Agora Financial in 2007, he worked for 20 years as an Emmy award-winning television news producer.

Recent Alerts


“Every single macroeconomic data point is irrelevant in the digital world,” declares Andrew Zatlin. In contrast, he says: “My secret sauce is data that nobody else has access to.” Read More

The Numbers Don’t Lie

“When food prices soar, consumers shift their spending,” says Andrew Zatlin. “From an investment perspective, this creates winners and losers.” Read More

America First

Three months into the Ukraine war, everyday Americans are growing weary of elite demands for wartime sacrifice. Read More

Dangerous 401(k) Delusions

So-called “target date” retirement funds have problems the financial media continue to gloss over. Read More

Apple’s “Quadruple Whammy”

Our main topic today surrounds the world’s biggest company — or what was once the world’s biggest until it was recently eclipsed. Read More

Bear Markets Don’t Matter (When You’re Starving)

We interrupt this impending bear market for another timely warning about famine. Read More

Avoid This Bear-Market Blunder

“Could you share some suggestions for people who are stuck with margin loans?” a reader asks our income-and-retirement expert Zach Scheidt. Read More

Ruble Rebound (Oops)

Let’s see… How is Washington’s campaign of economic warfare against Moscow going? Read More

The “Strong Dollar” Myth

You can’t escape headlines in the Establishment media about the strong U.S. dollar. But… strong compared with what? Read More

Finger-Pointing Time (Crypto)

Our resident crypto evangelist James Altucher tackles whether last week really amounted to crypto’s “Lehman moment” akin to the 2008 financial crisis. Read More