- Did you get a tax cut in 2018? Hold that thought…
- Coming soon: A new W-4 as bad as a 1040
- Soon-to-be-born royal baby subject to U.S. taxes
- Fewer Americans renouncing citizenship
- On socialism… capitalism… and government standing in the way of human evolution
OK, this is weird: The wealthier you are, the more likely you are to think the new tax law screwed you.
Welcome to a Tax Day edition of The 5 — packed with curiosities and oddities to chew on now that you’ve done the deed and filed your return. (We’re assuming if you haven’t filed yet, you’re probably not reading this right now. Well, unless you filed an extension…)
Today isn’t the first time we’ve tackled the gap between perception and reality with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 — only last week we called it “the most hated tax cut in history” — but even our jaded eyes opened wide at figures from SurveyMonkey and The New York Times.
First, a reminder that according to the Tax Policy Center, the TCJA delivered a tax cut to 64.8% of filers. That’s the reality.
Now the perception: According to the survey, only 39.6% thought they got a tax cut. (Hey, 39.6% was the top marginal rate under the old law. Spooky, huh?)
Here’s the thing: If your household income is under $30,000, you’re more likely to perceive your circumstances accurately: 30% of those folks thought they got a tax cut, and 32.1% actually did.
But perceptions become increasingly unmoored from reality as the income level grows…
- $30,000–50,000: About 69% of filers got a tax cut, but only 36.1% think they did
- $50,000–75,000: Roughly 82% of filers got a tax cut, but 41.5% believe they did
- $75,000–100,000: 86.6% of filers got a tax cut, but 47.9% think they did
- $100,000 and up: 89.5% of filers got a tax cut, but only 46.4% believe they did.
Summarizes the Times story about the survey: “To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.”
Yep. What have we been saying the last couple months about how the tax cut wasn’t made tangible or visible to the taxpaying public?
Leave it to the GOP to foul up a two-car funeral procession…
And just wait until working stiffs fill out a “new and improved” W-4 form later this year.
Because the IRS bollixed up withholding guidelines for employers last year — which left many people owing money instead of getting the refund they were accustomed to — well, we’ll let USA Today explain it…
“The agency plans to release a new W-4 form that better incorporates the changes ushered in by the new tax law so that the amount held back for taxes in each of your paychecks is more accurate.”
Sounds great in theory. But in practice, “It’ll be a much bigger pain,” says Pete Isberg from ADP, the giant payroll processor. “The accuracy will be 100%, but the ease of use will be zero.”
The IRS issued a rough-draft version of the form last summer. Gone are the exemptions that never made much sense and had little bearing on your actual tax liability. But added are a boatload of complications. You’ll have to guess at your interest and dividend income… your deductions and credits… and the income of your spouse, kids and other members of your household.
Isberg’s verdict: “It looked a lot more like the 1040 than a W-4.”
Joy and rapture!
The next draft is due by May 31 and this time it’ll be open for public comment — which we expect will be excoriating.
The final version should be out by year-end — which won’t be any help at all for your 2019 taxes. Good luck!
Meanwhile, the newest addition to the British royal family will have the “privilege” of paying American income taxes.
The Duchess of Sussex — still better known as Meghan Markle — is a U.S. citizen. And thus so will her baby, due later this month or early next.
As the BBC explains, “The U.S. is one of only a few countries to charge tax based on citizenship and not residency. Other countries that tax nonresident citizens include Eritrea and Myanmar.”
That sounds like fine company to be in, no?
“Any American who has lived in the U.S. in the last five years automatically passes on their citizenship to their offspring,” the Beeb continues. And it seems the duchess has to jump through the same hoops anyone else does before she can obtain U.K. citizenship.
Once she does, she could theoretically surrender her U.S. passport. But not her child: U.S. law declares minors under age 16 are “presumed not to have the requisite maturity” to make that decision.
As a practical consequence, “Children who earn under $2,000 can file their taxes with their parents’, but a royal baby will possibly have gifts and inherited assets that will have to be declared to the IRS,” says the BBC.
If the duchess eventually surrenders her U.S. citizenship, she’ll be part of a trend that’s exploded in the past decade… but is now leveling off.
Just under 4,000 Americans gave up their U.S. citizenship during 2018 — a marked drop from the previous year. In contrast, the trend was nearly parabolic from 2008–2016…
The 5 was early in spotting this trend, well before the mainstream caught on in 2012–13 when a handful of celebrities — notably Tina Turner and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin — grabbed headlines for taking the big step.
Of course, the mainstream quickly adopted the drumbeat that this extreme level of expatriation was a tool of “the rich” to avoid paying their “fair share.”
The reality, as we said all along, was that most people renouncing their citizenship were everyday folks earning pedestrian salaries who can’t afford to pay taxes to two nations.
It’s true there’s an exclusion for the first $100,000 of foreign earnings. But merely filing a tax return while working overseas is overwhelming and expensive — typically costing $2,000 to do it right. What’s more, given the IRS’ onerous requirements on foreign banks with U.S. customers, most foreign banks want nothing to do with U.S. customers anymore.
So why the drop since 2016, which accelerated last year?
We can only speculate. Perhaps it’s the wealthy feeling less burdened by the new tax law. Perhaps it’s the not-so-wealthy who can’t afford the higher processing fee for renouncing citizenship: It more than quintupled in 2014 to $2,350.
And the numbers on that chart aren’t the last word. They might well be understated.
International tax lawyer Andrew Mitchel tracks these numbers more closely than anyone else. Two years ago, he spotted a curious anomaly. “During the first quarter of 2017,” he writes, “the FBI added 1,484 individuals who renounced their U.S. citizenship to the NICS index.
“The IRS list is supposed to include U.S. citizens who have lost their U.S. citizenship as well as long-term green card holders who have terminated their green cards. The IRS number is lower than the FBI number, when we would expect it to be significantly higher than the FBI number.”
The second trading day of earnings season is a snooze.
The major U.S. stock indexes are in the red, but not by much. At last check, the Dow has shed 37 points to sit at 26,375. Gold is mostly steady at $1,288.
The big earnings number of the day is Goldman Sachs: The vampire squid delivered a solid “beat,” but traders are still bummed that earnings are down 21% from a year ago. At last check GS is down 3%.
The only economic number of note is the first one to include data for the month of April: The Federal Reserve’s Empire State Manufacturing Survey — taking the pulse of factory activity in New York State — came in better than expected, notching the best number in four months.
On the subject of “universal basic income,” a reader writes, “Can you do a blurb in The 5 explaining how we aren’t socialist already?
“The federal government regulates health care, education and transportation, as well as subsidizes them. Further, my household electric, gas and water bills are big-time regulated by the government.
“No one in the Democratic Party is suggesting the government control what products or services are provided in the economy a la communism — only 5,000 Trabants produced this year, etc.
“How are we not socialist already? Medicare for all and UBI have to be paid for, that’s true. But with health care costing twice as much here as anywhere else and major savings to be found through automation (or a machine tax?), paying for all this doesn’t necessarily have to be via an income tax.”
“I cannot help but observe that we are not now — if we have ever truly been — in anything close to a true free market economy,” writes another.
“Only those truly drinking the Kool-Aid from the left and the right could believe otherwise. Although in all fairness it isn’t like our schools teach economics. Those who stop their education after school are truly at a disadvantage.
“In an ideal world, things would be very different. The natural state of things would be a deflationary environment in which the continual increases in productivity would drive the cost of living down further and further as competition and technology made life better for the masses. But our profligate politicians and central banks have insured that will never happen. The corporate monoliths that line their campaign coffers have no such interests at heart. The ‘powers that be’ are quite happy to have everyone as debt slaves.
“They have just dressed it up as ‘freedom’ and the uninformed masses are drinking that stuff up like free margaritas an hour before last call. You do all the work. They take all your profits and (barely) leave you enough to subsist. But they let you think you have a choice with bank A; credit card company B; and utilities C, D and E; and because they allow you to pick your master people believe they are free. The greatest feat the devil ever pulled off was to convince the masses he doesn’t exist.
“We are coming to an inflection point, though, that I refer to as the Productivity Paradox. We have become so good with automation and so productive that we no longer need everyone to produce everything that everyone needs. In my pocket I carry a smartphone that can replace all of what a small back office would have once been required to accomplish, to say nothing of what I can do on a relatively cheap desktop workstation, a printer and good internet connectivity. Simply put, we don’t have enough that we need people to do.
“In an ideal world this would mean that people would be free to pursue arts, education and sciences and spend quality time with family and friends, as they can accomplish the same amount of work in much less time. But that isn’t how our world works. No, if you can do three times as much, well, we can keep working you into an early grave and fire three of your co-workers. Overhead, you know…”
The 5: We have to cut off the reader’s letter at this point to make the most of our 5 Mins. We’ll get to the rest of it tomorrow. But he reminds us of something we wrote three years ago, which we’ll reproduce here…
Among government’s many misdeeds, this might be the worst: Government is serving to retard the evolution of mankind — and at a critical juncture.
Anywhere on the globe that capitalism managed to get a foothold for a reasonable amount of time — and where war has not broken out — technology has reached a point of easily meeting the basic human needs for survival and safety. We’re talking food, clothing, shelter, heat.
Indeed, there’s a fair amount of material comfort to be had with a minimum of effort. If you define wealth as something you either grow or mine or manufacture, we’ve got a working template now. The bottom two levels on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs? Check ’em off. Done.
Now, there’s not much that capitalism and technology can do about the next three levels. But it doesn’t need to. It’s already solved the conundrum of the first two.
That should free us up to pursue the top three with alacrity, right? The four-hour workday that Benjamin Franklin envisioned in the 18th century should be our birthright by now.
With the wonders wrought by capitalism and technology, there should be ample time we can devote to deepening our interpersonal relationships and our spiritual lives. To grow closer to each other and to God (however you might define that). Isn’t that the logical endpoint of human evolution after these many millennia of physical struggle?
But no. The beast of government must be fed. So must all the parasites that require government favors — Wall Street, health care, higher education, the military-industrial complex. And behind it all, the dead hand of central banking and unsound money.
Where does it all end? More from our reader tomorrow…
The 5 Min. Forecast
P.S. Today will be the last time we remind you about the Rich Dad 2019 Tax Guide prepared by Robert Kiyosaki and his hand-picked team of tax pros. It’s stuffed with 91 tips and tricks that’ll help you keep more of what’s yours.
Sure, you’ve probably filed already. But it’s not too soon to think about next year… and you might even learn something that makes it worth your while to file an amended return this year and get a check from Uncle Sam.
You can claim your free copy at this link. And if you follow through on the offer at that link, you’ll get the 2020 edition as soon as it’s ready.
Much of the hot mess that’s “cybersecurity” in the United States can be laid at the feet of the U.S. government. Read More
Investing legend Jeremy Grantham says: “The thing about a bubble… it can keep going.” Read More
The Federal Reserve’s twice-yearly Financial Stability Report whistled past the graveyard where Archegos Capital Management will soon be interred. Read More
“While China may be the leader in the race to build central bank digital currency (CBDC),” says Jim Rickards, “the Fed has not been caught napping…” Read More
The Central Bank of Russia has been loading up on gold for years. “No one plays the gold market better,” observes Jim Rickards. Read More
If China forces Taiwan reunification, is the U.S. ready to go to war with China? Read More
The mainstream is finally recognizing that a new era of the mom and pop investor has arrived. Read More
“Financial technology (FinTech) — along with some good old-fashioned creativity — has opened an elite market to the masses,” says Zach Scheidt. Read More
“Even prior to COVID, moving to the suburbs seemed to make economic sense relative to higher city prices,” says former Wall Street banker Dr. Nomi Prins. Read More
As the number of American companies dwindles, George Gilder says: “Now [investors] have to find where the new value is really being generated.” Read More